hosthy.blogg.se

Intel burn test results 3.131396e-002
Intel burn test results 3.131396e-002





intel burn test results 3.131396e-002
  1. Intel burn test results 3.131396e 002 software#
  2. Intel burn test results 3.131396e 002 professional#
  3. Intel burn test results 3.131396e 002 windows#

Simplifies the process of selecting a test size to use.4. Real-time output of results to the screen.3. Use the same stress-testing engine that Intel uses to test their products before they are packed and put on shelves for sale.Benefits of using IntelBurnTest:1. Takes less time to tell if your CPU/RAM is unstable than Prime95 (usually something like 8 minutes Linpack vs 40 hours under Prime95).3. More accurate than Prime95 Small FFTs/Blend.2.

Intel burn test results 3.131396e 002 windows#

Tested on Microsoft(R) Windows Vista(tm) X86/X64by many awesome users like yourself Benefits of using Linpack:1.

Intel burn test results 3.131396e 002 professional#

Alsotested on AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition.Tested on Microsoft(R) Windows XP Professional SP2/SP3, XP ProfessionalX64 Edition SP2. Tested Intel(R) Core 2(tm) QuadQ6600, Intel(R) Pentium(tm) III 550 MHz, AMD Athlon 64(tm) X2 4200+,and AMD Opteron 165 (Working with AMD processors since v1.7). By using this program, youagree that neither I nor Intel shall be responsible for including, but notlimited to: burned up CPU, fried motherboard, spontaneous room temperatureincrease, hair loss, or mental stress.Compatibility:Works with Intel(R) and AMD CPUs.

intel burn test results 3.131396e-002

This program willmake usage of Linpack easier and more practical.Keep in mind, use this program at your own risk.

Intel burn test results 3.131396e 002 software#

Load temp under Linpack willbe up to 22*C higher than the competing software Prime95. Linpack byIntel(R) is an extremely stressful program that will put even the most pow-erful X86/X64 CPU in the world at its knees. Load temp under Linpack will be up to 22*C higher than the competing software Prime95.Ī program that simplifies the usage of Intel(R) Linpack. Well, here's some pics, please tell me what you think:Īnd a close-up of the caddy and mounting - the aluminium plate will get the same color as the interior plastics, some or other glossy black.This is an extremely stressful program that will put even the most powerful X86/X64 CPU in the world at its knees. the advantage is, well, SAS drives, fast, enterprise reliability, battery-backed wb-cache, etc.plus, I can fit 8, where the original HP design allowed for 5 drives in the Blackbird.Īnd, I think it looks much neater than the original design - this is something Voodoo/HP should have done too - the cost of designing a new backplane from scratch vs using the SAS one would not have made a difference to the final pricing. With that done, I fitted the SAS (8x) 2.5" harddrive cage from a HP M元70 T05 server, similar to the one I am using in the Apple CaseMod. Well, fixing the problem in point 1, I decided to remove the stock SATA backplane that came with the Blackbird: Other than that, a very well-designed and engineered case. Ok, back to the setup - the only real gripe I had with a very well designed case was a few minor things:ġ) The harddrive slide in trays are hiddeous, cheap plastic things - they could have done a better job here.Ģ) Mounting any decent aftermarket radiator is going to be a pain (but I have it covered)ģ) the clips keeping PCI cards in place is also crap quality, and prone to cracking/breaking - Voodoo/HP need to focus on the aspect. Click to expand.I guess I was very lucky, right time and place, and a crapload of money - the case, with shipping to Australia was around USD $1,200 - ouch, but worth it







Intel burn test results 3.131396e-002