

- Intel burn test results 3.131396e 002 software#
- Intel burn test results 3.131396e 002 professional#
- Intel burn test results 3.131396e 002 windows#
Simplifies the process of selecting a test size to use.4. Real-time output of results to the screen.3. Use the same stress-testing engine that Intel uses to test their products before they are packed and put on shelves for sale.Benefits of using IntelBurnTest:1. Takes less time to tell if your CPU/RAM is unstable than Prime95 (usually something like 8 minutes Linpack vs 40 hours under Prime95).3. More accurate than Prime95 Small FFTs/Blend.2.
Intel burn test results 3.131396e 002 windows#
Tested on Microsoft(R) Windows Vista(tm) X86/X64by many awesome users like yourself Benefits of using Linpack:1.
Intel burn test results 3.131396e 002 professional#
Alsotested on AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition.Tested on Microsoft(R) Windows XP Professional SP2/SP3, XP ProfessionalX64 Edition SP2. Tested Intel(R) Core 2(tm) QuadQ6600, Intel(R) Pentium(tm) III 550 MHz, AMD Athlon 64(tm) X2 4200+,and AMD Opteron 165 (Working with AMD processors since v1.7). By using this program, youagree that neither I nor Intel shall be responsible for including, but notlimited to: burned up CPU, fried motherboard, spontaneous room temperatureincrease, hair loss, or mental stress.Compatibility:Works with Intel(R) and AMD CPUs.

This program willmake usage of Linpack easier and more practical.Keep in mind, use this program at your own risk.
Intel burn test results 3.131396e 002 software#
Load temp under Linpack willbe up to 22*C higher than the competing software Prime95. Linpack byIntel(R) is an extremely stressful program that will put even the most pow-erful X86/X64 CPU in the world at its knees. Load temp under Linpack will be up to 22*C higher than the competing software Prime95.Ī program that simplifies the usage of Intel(R) Linpack. Well, here's some pics, please tell me what you think:Īnd a close-up of the caddy and mounting - the aluminium plate will get the same color as the interior plastics, some or other glossy black.This is an extremely stressful program that will put even the most powerful X86/X64 CPU in the world at its knees. the advantage is, well, SAS drives, fast, enterprise reliability, battery-backed wb-cache, etc.plus, I can fit 8, where the original HP design allowed for 5 drives in the Blackbird.Īnd, I think it looks much neater than the original design - this is something Voodoo/HP should have done too - the cost of designing a new backplane from scratch vs using the SAS one would not have made a difference to the final pricing. With that done, I fitted the SAS (8x) 2.5" harddrive cage from a HP M元70 T05 server, similar to the one I am using in the Apple CaseMod. Well, fixing the problem in point 1, I decided to remove the stock SATA backplane that came with the Blackbird: Other than that, a very well-designed and engineered case. Ok, back to the setup - the only real gripe I had with a very well designed case was a few minor things:ġ) The harddrive slide in trays are hiddeous, cheap plastic things - they could have done a better job here.Ģ) Mounting any decent aftermarket radiator is going to be a pain (but I have it covered)ģ) the clips keeping PCI cards in place is also crap quality, and prone to cracking/breaking - Voodoo/HP need to focus on the aspect. Click to expand.I guess I was very lucky, right time and place, and a crapload of money - the case, with shipping to Australia was around USD $1,200 - ouch, but worth it
